The Anti-War Movement Continues
When 2 million marched against war, taking over the streets of London on February
15, the overwhelming feeling was one of hope. By April 12, the date of the most
recent massive national anti-war demonstration in Britain, with the Anglo-American
onslaught on the people of Iraq entering its fourth week, the mood had changed
to one of mourning and anger, but also defiance and determination.
The protestors held placards saying ‘No Justice – No Peace: US and
UK Out of the Middle East’ and charging Bush and Blair with War Crimes,
but most eloquent were the thousands of photographs they carried of Iraqi children
who had become victims of the ‘Allies’ cluster bombs, tanks and
snipers. From school students to striking fire-fighters, Muslim organisations
to anarchist groups, the demonstrators showed their contempt for the lies of
the Blair government and the media, chanting ‘You call it liberation –
we know it’s occupation!’ and ‘Exxon, Esso, BP, Shell, take
your war and go to hell’.
While some of the avowedly ‘apolitical’ demonstrators who had swelled
the ranks of the pre-war marches had inevitably fallen away disillusioned with
the government’s brazen indifference to public opinion, the anti-war movement
itself had belied the predictions of the media and consolidated itself in the
intervening weeks, emerging as a powerful, left-led political force which is
unlikely to be washed away by the current tide of colonial-style triumphalism,
and will be able to adapt and continue to grow as the situation in Iraq moves
from open war to imperialist occupation, balkanisation, and new bases for domination
of the entire Middle East – and America’s lethal drive for global
hegemony enters its next phase.
The emergence of this movement will clearly have a lasting effect within Britain
itself. While the ‘conclusion’ of the war in Iraq has saved Blair’s
skin for the moment, in the long term it is unlikely that he can politically
survive the massive erosion in grassroots support within the Labour Party which
his imperialist adventures with Bush have brought about, and with the pretext
of Saddam’s ‘weapons of mass destruction’ now thoroughly exposed
as an opportunistic lie, even the less than principled MPs of New Labour are
demanding answers. However, more significant in the long term than Blair’s
political future is the revitalisation of the left which the anti-war movement
has brought about. Even more than the earlier anti-globalisation initiatives,
post-September 11 developments have finally forced the issues of imperialism
and racism to the top of the agenda for the mainstream left, and considerably
strengthened it as a result.
Particularly significant has been the radicalisation of large sections of school
students, many as young as 15 or 16, who organised mass walkouts from their
classes, and on the day the war on Iraq officially began, converged in their
thousands on Parliament Square for a sit down protest which stopped traffic
for most of the day, braving police harassment and brutality. These students,
among whom girls are at the forefront, have continued to organise despite threats
that they would be expelled from school on the eve of national examinations,
with the schools being urged by the government to treat participation in anti-war
protests as truancy! Schools, in which political discussion has traditionally
been taboo in Britain, are becoming increasingly politicised arenas.
And of course, even as Blair, Home Secretary David Blunkett and their captive
media continue to project explicitly racist views of ‘Muslim’ youth
as alienated from ‘democratic’ political processes and potentially
violent, large numbers of young people from Muslim backgrounds – mainly
of South Asian origin – are participating in the anti-war movement. Barriers
between communities are actually being broken down by a common opposition to
Blair and Bush’s war.
— Kalpana Wilson